Skip to content
Birdie Brae

A Journal for the Thrifty Gowfer

Culture & Stories

Scotland vs St Andrews: Is the Old Course Really Worth All the Fuss?

A top-tier green fee, an access system that often says no, and one of the strangest rounds you'll ever play. The answer on whether the Home of Golf is actually worth the trip.

By the Birdie Brae editor11 May 2026Updated 27 September 20265 min read
The Swilcan Bridge at the 18th hole of the Old Course in soft morning lightPlate I

The version of the Old Course that doesn't make the magazine photography is the access question: the ballot that doesn't go your way, the tee time you can't get, the sense that the whole institution is being performed slightly over your head. The round itself, if and when you get it, is a different matter, and we'll come to that. But the start of this conversation should be honest about access, because access is most of the complaint people really mean when they ask whether the place is worth it.

The case against

The Old Course is expensive. £355 at the top of the season is a lot for a round of golf by any measure, and it sits at the top end of the famous Scottish links. Kingsbarns (£399–£486), which we would argue is a more consistently well-maintained course with better sea views, costs more still.

The Old Course is also strange in ways that the internet doesn't prepare you for. Seven of the eighteen greens are shared with other holes. The fairways are so wide in places that you can hit a driver miles off-line and still be playing from short grass, and then find yourself 280 yards from a green with a railway line between you and it. The bunkers are deep in a way that is genuinely funny the first time you climb into one and genuinely not funny the second. There is a cabbage patch of a hole, the 11th, where locals argue regularly about the best line. Your card will not go well if you've never played links golf before, and it will probably not go well if you have.

Add to that the weather. The Old Course is exposed — it sits on a flat promontory facing the North Sea — and the wind shifts direction halfway through the round at least 50% of the time. A hole that plays driver-wedge in the morning can play driver-fairway-wood-wedge-in-the-gorse in the afternoon. Expect to be asked to restart on the 10th tee after a rainstorm. Expect to be asked to finish in the dark because your round was delayed by the one in front.

And finally: the town of St Andrews, which is genuinely lovely, was not designed for the volume of golf tourism it now receives. The streets are packed from April to October. The restaurants want reservations. Hotel rooms in June are priced for that demand. Your £355 high-season green fee arrives on top of the room, a caddie (the fee is set by the Links Trust's caddie office — ask when you book the tee time), dinner, and possibly a set of hire clubs. Price the whole day before you commit to it, not just the round. (And in July 2027, when The Open comes back, the squeeze goes up another gear — the Open 2027 where-to-stay guide exists because of it.)

That's the case against.

The case for

And yet.

No two rounds on it are the same, and most contain at least one moment where the course does something so surprising that it becomes the story you tell afterwards. You walk up the 18th fairway — the widest finishing hole in championship golf, flanked by the Royal and Ancient clubhouse, the Old Course Hotel, the grey stone of the town — and it doesn't matter how your round has gone. You stop talking. The person with you stops talking. You are in the same piece of ground where every golfer you've ever heard of has walked, and it's an absurd feeling, and you can't engineer it anywhere else in sport.

The shared greens are strange until you realise they're the clearest living link to the 19th century, when the course was played in whatever direction suited the prevailing wind on the day. The wide fairways are there because the original course was played over common land the townspeople also used for their sheep. The bunkers are deep because they're Victorian, dug by hand, and the sand was shaped by weather before anyone invented greenkeeping machinery. You are not playing an artefact, exactly — it's a working course, the town still owns it, locals still play it on concessionary rates — but you are playing the clearest unbroken link to the game's beginnings that exists anywhere.

That matters to some golfers more than others. If it matters to you even a little, then yes: the Old Course is worth it. Once.

The quiet answer

Here is what we'd say to most visitors who ask.

If you have seven days in Scotland, play the Old Course on day three or four. Not day one, because you'll be tired from the flight and the wind will ruin the memory. Not day seven, because if the ballot doesn't go your way you've lost the chance. Day three or four gives you a window, a fall-back, and enough recent rounds to know what you're doing when you get there.

If you have three days in Scotland, don't try for the Old Course. Play Kingsbarns. Play Elie. Play Crail. Have a better round in less wind at a fraction of the cost, and come back next time for the pilgrimage.

If you have one day in Scotland — honestly, we would play Musselburgh Old Links in the morning and the New Course at St Andrews in the afternoon, and skip the Old Course entirely. The oldest playing course in the world, plus the St Andrews sister course that most locals prefer to the Old anyway. Two rounds for the price of half of one.

On playing it twice

A small, honest point. A bad round in bad weather on the Old Course is still a bad round. The experience of the Old Course is not reliably wonderful. It is reliably significant. Those are different things, and most of the internet conflates them.

It isn't a course most golfers can afford to revisit. It is, accordingly, a course most golfers only play once. Let that round be as good as you can make it: the right month, the right weather forecast, the right playing partners, a caddie who knows your game, and a meal booked for after.

One round at the Old Course, played well, will stay with you for the rest of your playing life. Three rounds in a week means three green fees of up to £355 each before a caddie or a bed, and will probably contain one you'd like to forget.

Where this leaves us

So: worth the fuss, yes, with caveats. Worth the money if you value the history more than the conditioning, which is a matter for your conscience. Worth doing at all costs, no — there are rounds cheaper, less windy, better-maintained, more scenic, and at least three that are more technically interesting to play. Do them too.

Share

PostEmail

Spotted something?

A wrong fee, a closed course, a typo. We read every email.

Email us a correction →

About the author

The Birdie Brae editor

Editor and founder of Birdie Brae. Based in Glasgow, 12.7 handicap, playing since late 2021. Has played 20+ Scottish courses and started this site because most Scottish golf content is written by people trying to sell you a package holiday.

More about the editor →

Also in the Almanac

Playing Golf in the Rain: A Scottish Golfer's Honest Guide

It rains in Scotland. If you're visiting to play golf, you will almost certainly play at least one wet round. This is fine — it is genuinely fine — and with the right preparation, a wet round on a Scottish links is a better experience than a dry round on most other courses in the world.

6 Sept 2026

The Sunday Post

A good round, a fair fee, and a story from the clubhouse.

One email, most Sundays. No affiliate spam, no drip funnel, no nonsense. Just the tee time we'd book this week, the muni we'd play before work, and one piece of Scottish golf history worth the read.

Written by someone who actually plays here.

Put me on the list.

Unsubscribe any time — no hard feelings.

We send one email a week. No more, no less.